{"id":18973,"date":"2015-09-28T00:57:43","date_gmt":"2015-09-28T05:57:43","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=18973"},"modified":"2015-09-27T07:59:24","modified_gmt":"2015-09-27T12:59:24","slug":"id-exclusionary-rule-doesnt-apply-to-dl-suspension","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=18973","title":{"rendered":"ID: Exclusionary rule doesn&#8217;t apply to DL suspension"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>The exclusionary rule doesn\u2019t apply to administrative license suspensions for driving under the influence. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.isc.idaho.gov\/opinions\/42040opinion.pdf\">Bobeck v. Idaho Transp. Dep&#8217;t<\/a>, 2015 Ida. App. LEXIS 86 (September 24, 2015).<\/p>\n<p>Defendant was stopped for speeding, but he couldn\u2019t answer basic question about much of anything, and reasonable suspicion thus developed for a detention for a dog sniff. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.supremecourt.ohio.gov\/rod\/docs\/pdf\/3\/2015\/2015-Ohio-3812.pdf\">State v. Gibson<\/a>, 2015-Ohio-3812, 2015 Ohio App. LEXIS 3707 (3d Dist. September 21, 2015).*<\/p>\n<p>Defendant was stopped at a safety checkpoint for DLs and insurance papers, and he was found intoxicated. The checkpoint was properly set up and conducted, and the motion to suppress was properly denied. <a href=\"https:\/\/efast.gaappeals.us\/download?filingId=5b33f7d8-e5a8-4b7d-a043-54f71861bf33\">Moss v. State<\/a>, 2015 Ga. App. LEXIS 552 (September 23, 2015).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The exclusionary rule doesn\u2019t apply to administrative license suspensions for driving under the influence. Bobeck v. Idaho Transp. Dep&#8217;t, 2015 Ida. App. LEXIS 86 (September 24, 2015). Defendant was stopped for speeding, but he couldn\u2019t answer basic question about much &hellip; <a class=\"more-link\" href=\"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=18973\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[14,35,61],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-18973","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-exclusionary-rule","category-reasonable-suspicion","category-roadblocks"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/18973","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=18973"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/18973\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":18974,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/18973\/revisions\/18974"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=18973"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=18973"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=18973"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}