When a cotenant with authority consents, the officers do not have to seek out the \u201ctarget\u201d for his consent, too. United States v. Morales, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 125085 (S.D.Fla. September 18, 2015), R&R 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 125086 (S.D.Fla. June 24, 2015)<\/p>\n
Defendant was arrested with a warrant, so the search incident was valid. The searches of his cell phones were with valid search warrants. United States v. Moquete, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 123293 (D.Md. September 15, 2015).*<\/p>\n
The affidavit recited 14 \u201csources of information,\u201d only 4 of whom the officer talked to. None of the individual pieces provided probable cause and some were even stale, but the totality of information was probable cause and not stale. United States v. Malek, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 121948 (D.S.D. August 21, 2015) [helpful analysis here for the practitioner].<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
When a cotenant with authority consents, the officers do not have to seek out the \u201ctarget\u201d for his consent, too. United States v. Morales, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 125085 (S.D.Fla. September 18, 2015), R&R 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 125086 (S.D.Fla. … Continue reading