Defendant consented to search of his cell phone. Proof of knowledge of rights comes from the fact he earlier gave a limited consent to search other property. United States v. Thurman, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 117893 (N.D. Ill. September 3, 2015).<\/p>\n
Defendant failed to make a substantial preliminary showing of falsity in the search warrant affidavit as to where the trash bins were at the time of the trash pull. Her testimony about her pattern and practice that they couldn\u2019t have been at the curb at the time of their search didn\u2019t overcome the two officers\u2019 testimony that they were there. United States v. Gay, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 118750 (E.D. N.C. June 22, 2015).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Defendant consented to search of his cell phone. Proof of knowledge of rights comes from the fact he earlier gave a limited consent to search other property. United States v. Thurman, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 117893 (N.D. Ill. September 3, … Continue reading