Defendant\u2019s Rule 17 subpoena for personnel files to the city police involved in a stop and search on an Amtrak train was quashed. There was no showing that it would produce evidence of any value at this point in the case. Defendant said he was looking for cross-examination material. United States v. Estes, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 118519 (D.Nev. September 4, 2015).<\/p>\n
A Border Patrol officer lived 2\u00bd blocks from the border in Naco, Arizona, and he\u2019d lived there all his life and knew everybody in town. He saw a vehicle in the alley behind his house that appeared to him was picking up two illegal aliens. He passed this on to other officers and that was sufficient for reasonable suspicion under collective knowledge. United States v. Sosa, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 118492 (D.Ariz. September 3, 2015).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Defendant\u2019s Rule 17 subpoena for personnel files to the city police involved in a stop and search on an Amtrak train was quashed. There was no showing that it would produce evidence of any value at this point in the … Continue reading