Arguing for trespass rather than the reasonable expectation of privacy standard doesn\u2019t enhance the likelihood of showing standing. \u201cProceeding under the trespass theory, rather than the reasonable expectation of privacy theory, defendants have not demonstrated that they have a possessory interest in the driveway or parking lot to establish standing to assert a Fourth Amendment violation.\u201d United States v. Ellis, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 108231 (N.D.Cal. August 17, 2015).<\/p>\n
The application for cell site location information was based on probable cause. Commonwealth v. Augustine<\/a>, 2015 Mass. LEXIS 614 (August 18, 2015).<\/p>\n Jaywalking justified defendant\u2019s stop and production of his ID. Defendant consented to a search, and his bus ticket didn\u2019t match his ID, so the stop could be prolonged. State v. Nwachukwa<\/a>, 2015-Ohio-3282, 2015 Ohio App. LEXIS 3191 (3d Dist. August 17, 2015).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Arguing for trespass rather than the reasonable expectation of privacy standard doesn\u2019t enhance the likelihood of showing standing. \u201cProceeding under the trespass theory, rather than the reasonable expectation of privacy theory, defendants have not demonstrated that they have a possessory … Continue reading