Showing up at a prearranged drop point, a motel room, was reasonable suspicion that the defendant was there with the drugs. United States v. Mendoza, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 109526 (N.D.Fla. August 18, 2015).*<\/p>\n
A worker\u2019s gesture was not consent to enter; it was, essentially, he didn\u2019t care. But, even so, there was no showing by the government that the worker had apparent authority to consent. Suspicious asbestos on the property was not an exigent circumstance requiring immediate action. United States v. Kolokouris, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 109105 (W.D.N.Y. August 14, 2015).*<\/p>\n
Officers had information that defendant was a pimp, and that was reasonable cause for a stop. Dropping off a known prostitute would be reasonable suspicion anyway. When officers stopped defendant, the first question asked was about drugs and guns, and defendant admitted that he had a gun. That was reason enough to get him out of the car. United States v. Fortenberry, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 109583 (D.Nev. July 10, 2015).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Showing up at a prearranged drop point, a motel room, was reasonable suspicion that the defendant was there with the drugs. United States v. Mendoza, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 109526 (N.D.Fla. August 18, 2015).* A worker\u2019s gesture was not consent … Continue reading