{"id":18469,"date":"2015-08-16T15:55:34","date_gmt":"2015-08-16T20:55:34","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=18469"},"modified":"2015-08-17T07:53:02","modified_gmt":"2015-08-17T12:53:02","slug":"n-d-ga-to-get-a-hearing-on-a-motion-to-suppress-defendant-has-to-allege-facts-sufficient-to-provide-relief","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=18469","title":{"rendered":"N.D.Ga.: To get a hearing on a motion to suppress, defendant has to allege facts sufficient to provide relief"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>To get a hearing on a motion to suppress, defendant has to allege facts sufficient to provide relief, if they can be proved. United States v. Ochoa, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 105925 (N.D.Ga. July 8, 2015).<\/p>\n<p>Officers had reasonable suspicion of drug trafficking by the time they stopped defendant for illegally parking in a fire lane. Then they encountered the smell of marijuana coming from the car. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.supremecourt.ohio.gov\/rod\/docs\/pdf\/8\/2015\/2015-Ohio-3229.pdf\">State v. Grayson<\/a>, 2015-Ohio-3229, 2015 Ohio App. LEXIS 3141 (8th Dist. August 13, 2015).*<\/p>\n<p>\u201c[I]rrespective of whether Detective Santini violated state law when conducting extraterritorial controlled buys, the search warrant and subsequent search did not offend any standards developed under the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution, and the exclusionary rule need not be considered.\u201d United States v. Watkins,  2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 107096 (E.D.Mich. August 14, 2015).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>To get a hearing on a motion to suppress, defendant has to allege facts sufficient to provide relief, if they can be proved. United States v. Ochoa, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 105925 (N.D.Ga. July 8, 2015). Officers had reasonable suspicion &hellip; <a class=\"more-link\" href=\"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=18469\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[66,35,63],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-18469","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-burden-of-proof","category-reasonable-suspicion","category-reasonableness"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/18469","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=18469"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/18469\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":18473,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/18469\/revisions\/18473"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=18469"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=18469"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=18469"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}