{"id":17845,"date":"2015-06-29T07:18:55","date_gmt":"2015-06-29T12:18:55","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=17845"},"modified":"2015-06-29T07:18:55","modified_gmt":"2015-06-29T12:18:55","slug":"tx1-a-subpoena-may-be-used-to-obtain-blood-test-results-obtained-for-medical-purposes-even-though-used-in-a-dwi-case","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=17845","title":{"rendered":"TX1: A subpoena may be used to obtain blood test results obtained for medical purposes even though used in a DWI case"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>The state may obtain defendant\u2019s blood draw for medical purposes by subpoena. Ferguson v. City of Charleston does not create a reasonable expectation of privacy from a subpoena, a form of legal process, for obtaining the results. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.search.txcourts.gov\/SearchMedia.aspx?MediaVersionID=1247b7b0-8668-4434-b376-12cc9e38403f&#038;MediaID=4f081497-fceb-47ac-8a85-6d96d1d0a525&#038;coa=%22%20+%20this.CurrentWebState.CurrentCourt%20+%20@%22&#038;DT=Opinion\">Rodriguez v. State<\/a>, 2015 Tex. App. LEXIS 6507 (Tex.App.\u2013Houston (1st Dist.)  June 25, 2015):<br \/>\n<!--more--><\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Legally, according to Rodriguez, Ferguson v. City of Charleston, 532 U.S. 67, 121 S. Ct. 1281, 149 L. Ed. 2d 205 (2001), recognizes a reasonable expectation of privacy for &#8220;those who undergo diagnostic tests in hospitals that\u2014absent other considerations not present here (like a legal duty to disclose)\u2014the results of their tests will not be shared with non-medical third parties.&#8221; We do not read Ferguson so broadly. There, the public hospital performed diagnostic tests at the State&#8217;s behest to obtain evidence of a patient&#8217;s criminal conduct for law-enforcement purposes without first obtaining the patient&#8217;s consent. See id. at 84-85, 121 S. Ct. at 1291-92. Here, the blood draw and blood-alcohol content test results were performed for medical treatment. This distinction renders Ferguson inapposite. See Murray v. State, 245 S.W.3d 37, 42 (Tex. App.\u2014Austin 2007, pet. ref&#8217;d); see also State v. Villarreal, No. PD-0306-14, 2014 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1898, 2014 WL 6734178, at *15 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014) (explaining that drug-testing policy was invalidated in Ferguson because immediate objective of searches was to generate evidence for law enforcement purposes); Garcia v. State, 95 S.W.3d 522, 526-27 n.1 (Tex. App.\u2014Houston [1st Dist.] 2002, no pet.) (following Hardy post-Ferguson and applying Hardy to appellant&#8217;s challenge under Texas Constitution). Ferguson does not support Rodriguez&#8217;s contention that the Fourth Amendment protects his expectation of privacy in the medical records containing the blood-test results.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The state may obtain defendant\u2019s blood draw for medical purposes by subpoena. Ferguson v. City of Charleston does not create a reasonable expectation of privacy from a subpoena, a form of legal process, for obtaining the results. Rodriguez v. State, &hellip; <a class=\"more-link\" href=\"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=17845\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[18,81],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-17845","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-reasonable-expectation-of-privacy","category-subpoenas"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/17845","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=17845"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/17845\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":17846,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/17845\/revisions\/17846"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=17845"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=17845"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=17845"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}