Following cases from other circuits, since this circuit hasn\u2019t ruled, the borrower of a car has standing to challenge its search. The traffic stop was justified, and reasonable suspicion developed thereafter. United States v. Baker, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 73856 (M.D.Fla. May 12, 2015).<\/p>\n
Plaintiff\u2019s excessive force claim against a police officer fails where she couldn\u2019t identify him as the one who wrestled her to the ground. His summary judgment materials said it was a security guard, and he joined in. She only speculated it was him who took her down. The failure to get medical treatment during her jail stay for her abrasions was not reckless indifference to a serious medical need under the Fourteenth Amendment. Morrison v. City of Atlanta<\/a>, 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 9591 (11th Cir. June 9, 2015).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Following cases from other circuits, since this circuit hasn\u2019t ruled, the borrower of a car has standing to challenge its search. The traffic stop was justified, and reasonable suspicion developed thereafter. United States v. Baker, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 73856 … Continue reading