{"id":1703,"date":"2008-04-06T17:40:24","date_gmt":"2008-01-18T05:40:04","guid":{"rendered":""},"modified":"-0001-11-30T00:00:00","modified_gmt":"2008-01-18T05:40:04","slug":"en-US","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=1703","title":{"rendered":"CA8: <em>Stone<\/em> does not apply to \u00a7 2255 proceedings"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><a href=\"http:\/\/caselaw.lp.findlaw.com\/scripts\/getcase.pl?court=us&amp;vol=428&amp;invol=465\"><em>Stone v. Powell<\/em><\/a> does not apply to \u00a7 2255 proceedings. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.ca8.uscourts.gov\/opndir\/08\/01\/062203P.pdf\">Baranski v. United States<\/a>, 515 F.3d 857 (8th Cir. 2008) (unpublished) (Comment:  PLEASE REFER TO FEDERAL RULES OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE RULE 32.1 GOVERNING THE CITATION TO UNPUBLISHED OPINIONS.<br \/>\nBut ends up in F.3d anyway):<\/p>\n<blockquote><p><em>Stone<\/em> left open the question of whether Fourth Amendment claims may be raised by federal prisoners under \u00a7 2255, see <em>Matta-Ballesteros v. Henman<\/em>, 896 F.2d 255, 262 n.8 (7th Cir. 1990), and it did not overrule <em>Kaufman v. United States<\/em>, 394 U.S. 217 (1969). See <em>Stone<\/em>, 428 U.S. at 479-81 &amp; n.16. In <em>Kaufman<\/em>, the Court had unequivocally held that a claim of unconstitutional search and seizure is cognizable in a \u00a7 2255 proceeding, 394 U.S. at 231, and a <em>Stone<\/em> footnote suggested a different policy reason might underlie <em>Kaufman<\/em> because of the Court&#8217;s supervisory role over federal proceedings. See 428 U.S. at 481 n.16. It is well recognized that the supervisory power of federal appellate courts over district courts is broader than its authority to review state court decisions under \u00a7 2254. See <em>Cupp v. Naughten<\/em>, 414 U.S. 141, 146 (1973). We conclude that <em>Stone<\/em> does not bar our consideration of the issue certified by the district court, that is whether <em>Groh v. Ramirez <\/em>would entitle Baranski to prevail on his \u00a7 2255 motion.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Defendant doctor consented to a search of patient files in her office as a part of a health care fraud investigation. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.ca6.uscourts.gov\/opinions.pdf\/08a0031p-06.pdf\">United States v. Moon<\/a>, 513 F.3d 527, 2008 FED App. 0031P (6th Cir. 2008):<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Agent Corbitt testified that three members of the TBI investigative team entered Defendant&#8217;s office dressed in &#8220;business professional&#8221; attire, with weapons concealed. Agents identified themselves to Defendant, explained that there was an ongoing investigation and requested access to particular patient files. Defendant inquired about the nature of the investigation but was not informed of the specific nature of the allegations. Following this conversation, Defendant stated it would be &#8220;fine&#8221; for agents to access requested files and that they &#8220;could scan whatever [they] needed to.&#8221; Further, Defendant provided agents with a space where they could scan the requested files.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>b2evALnk.b2WPAutP <a class=\"more-link\" href=\"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=1703\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"pingsdone","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1703","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1703","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=1703"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1703\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=1703"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=1703"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=1703"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}