This mere bailee didn\u2019t have any right to control the package that was shipped, and he thus didn\u2019t have standing to challenge its search, at least recognizing that some bailees might with better facts. More importantly, the government tracked the IP address of the person tracking the package on the USPS website. Unites States v. Bates, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 54599 (D. Mass. April 24, 2015).<\/p>\n
Defendant was stopped for weaving, was given a warning, was handed back the papers, and then the officer asked about contraband. \u201cThe fact that Defendant was not told specifically he was free to leave does not mean he was detained.\u201d Then the drug dog was walked around the car, the court relying on $404,905 (which was expressly rejected six weeks later by SCOTUS in Rodriguez). United States v. Bradley, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 54246 (W.D. Mo. March 11, 2015).<\/p>\n
Defendant need not have agreed to a \u201creasonable basis\u201d for a search condition on supervised release. Besides, there was consent. United States v. Majeroni<\/a>, 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 6946 (1st Cir. April 27, 2015).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" This mere bailee didn\u2019t have any right to control the package that was shipped, and he thus didn\u2019t have standing to challenge its search, at least recognizing that some bailees might with better facts. More importantly, the government tracked the … Continue reading