A power company stated an injury-in-fact for standing to contest the agency\u2019s action on, inter alia, Fourth Amendment grounds that its request for production of records in an audit constituted a likely Fourth Amendment violation for an overbroad or oppressive subpoena. Entergy Servs. v. United States Dep’t of Labor, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 183517 (E.D. La. December 15, 2014).<\/p>\n
The CI said that defendant and family were selling marijuana out of the house. \u201cThe informant\u2019s 100 percent \u2018track record\u2019 [in seven prior cases] provided a strong indicia of his or her reliability.\u201d There was probable cause for the search warrant for the house. Bellville v. State<\/a>, 2015 Tex. App. LEXIS ___ (Tex. App. \u2013 El Paso April 15, 2015).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" A power company stated an injury-in-fact for standing to contest the agency\u2019s action on, inter alia, Fourth Amendment grounds that its request for production of records in an audit constituted a likely Fourth Amendment violation for an overbroad or oppressive … Continue reading