Defendant\u2019s consent to search a box when he was in custody in a holding cell in Seattle airport\u2019s jail was shown to be voluntary. He said \u201cGo ahead. It\u2019s just helicopter parts.\u201d Heroin and meth were found in a radio in a box. Officers had their attention drawn to him because he had a warrant for his arrest. [Reading between the lines, one might assume that TSA found the warrant since they get passenger lists, and he was taken into custody at the gate getting on a flight to Juneau.] United States v. Benedict, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22808 (D.Alaska February 13, 2015).<\/p>\n
There was probable cause for issuance of a search warrant for defendant\u2019s house for child pornography on computers. United States v. Dorweiler, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22540 (D.Minn. February 9, 2015).*<\/p>\n
The only basis for using force during the stop of plaintiff\u2019s car was if there was a man in it, and then against him. The use of force against her, driving alone, was apparently excessive, and qualified immunity was properly denied. Brown v. Lewis<\/a>, 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 2917 (6th Cir. February 26, 2015).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Defendant\u2019s consent to search a box when he was in custody in a holding cell in Seattle airport\u2019s jail was shown to be voluntary. He said \u201cGo ahead. It\u2019s just helicopter parts.\u201d Heroin and meth were found in a radio … Continue reading