Defendant invited a wired CI into his place who video recorded only his conversations with him. This doesn\u2019t violate the Fourth Amendment, citing the \u201cfalse friend\u201d cases. United States v. Thompson, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18600 (W.D. Wis. February 17, 2015).<\/p>\n
The officers are considered more credible on the question of consent for a search of the house granted by defendant\u2019s wife after police responded to a domestic dispute. Defendant was in possession of several rifles while being a FIPF. The state law question of her being advised of a right to refuse consent wasn\u2019t presented to the trial court, so it\u2019s waived for appeal. Tate v. State, 2015 Ark. App. 72, 2015 Ark. App. LEXIS 120 (February 11, 2015).*<\/p>\n
A truck parked on the side of the road with the driver slumped over the wheel is reasonable suspicion. United States v. Maxwell, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18625 (W.D. Mo. January 13, 2015).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Defendant invited a wired CI into his place who video recorded only his conversations with him. This doesn\u2019t violate the Fourth Amendment, citing the \u201cfalse friend\u201d cases. United States v. Thompson, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18600 (W.D. Wis. February 17, … Continue reading