Defendant is charged with sex trafficking of a minor. The minor\u2019s aunt called 911 to report that she was held for prostitution, and the police were working to find her. The entry into defendant\u2019s apartment was on exigent circumstances to locate her on specific information that she was there. Defendant\u2019s computer was open and the screen was on, and that was plain view for using what was seen for a search warrant. United States v. Williams, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12547 (W.D.N.Y. February 2, 2015), 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 70262 (W.D.N.Y. May 29, 2015).<\/p>\n
Defendant\u2019s guilty plea waived his search claim for a 2255 post-conviction proceeding. Gresham v. United States, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11974 (N.D.Tex. February 2, 2015).*<\/p>\n
The officer\u2019s traffic stop was reasonable even if mistaken under Heien<\/a> because of how it was written, and that supports the stop. Reasonable suspicion developed after that. United States v. Stanbridge, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12156 (C.D. Ill. February 3, 2015).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Defendant is charged with sex trafficking of a minor. The minor\u2019s aunt called 911 to report that she was held for prostitution, and the police were working to find her. The entry into defendant\u2019s apartment was on exigent circumstances to … Continue reading