{"id":15612,"date":"2015-01-27T05:35:09","date_gmt":"2015-01-27T10:35:09","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=15612"},"modified":"2015-01-27T05:35:09","modified_gmt":"2015-01-27T10:35:09","slug":"ca8-stop-of-the-wrong-person-on-reasonable-but-mistaken-belief-not-suppressed","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=15612","title":{"rendered":"CA8: Stop of the wrong person on reasonable but mistaken belief not suppressed"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Based on an informant\u2019s story, the police were looking for Barefield in a particular car. They happened upon defendant Patrick at the appointed time and place near the informant in a car matching the description. A reasonable but mistaken belief that defendant and his car were the ones described by the informant here added up to even probable cause for the stop. <a href=\"http:\/\/media.ca8.uscourts.gov\/opndir\/15\/01\/141247P.pdf\">United States v. Patrick<\/a>, 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 1003 (8th Cir.  January 23, 2015):<br \/>\n<!--more--><\/p>\n<blockquote><p>In United States v. Bobo, 994 F.2d 524 (8th Cir. 1993), we confronted a similar situation. Police were searching for a Mr. Bobo with the alias &#8220;Hanky,&#8221; who was suspected of homicide. Id. at 525. Having narrowed their search to Richard Bobo and Marvin Bobo (brothers), police suspected Marvin. See id. at 525-26. With a &#8220;pickup order&#8221; for Marvin, one officer began searching for a large green Cadillac in &#8220;beat-up condition,&#8221; which eyewitness testimony tied to Marvin. Id. at 526. While on patrol, the officer happened upon &#8220;a green Cadillac in poor condition&#8221; driven by a man whom he &#8220;thought &#8230; closely resembled the mug shot of Marvin.&#8221; Id. Officers pulled over the Cadillac (after a brief chase), noticing the driver &#8220;duck[] to his right and &#8230; reach under the driver&#8217;s seat.&#8221; Id. Officers arrested the man and found a firearm under his seat, but they soon realized the driver was Marvin&#8217;s brother Richard, who also happened to be a felon. See id. Although Richard argued the arrest based on the mistaken identity was unlawful, we &#8220;note[d] that if the police had probable cause to arrest Marvin, and they reasonably believed that the man driving the green Cadillac was Marvin, then Richard&#8217;s arrest was a valid arrest.&#8221; Id. at 527. Because (1) the officers had good reason to suspect Marvin, (2) Richard resembled Marvin, and (3) Richard was driving a car tied to Marvin, we concluded police had probable cause to arrest Richard. See id.<\/p>\n<p>As with the Bobo brothers, the officers here had probable cause to suspect Barefield of a crime, and they reasonably believed the man driving the gold-brown Buick was Barefield. One of Agent Oliver&#8217;s known informants mistakenly had identified the driver as Barefield. Although we do not know the informant&#8217;s past reliability, he was known to Agent Oliver and was &#8220;enlisted &#8230; to be a confidential informant, and therefore, could be held accountable &#8230; for false information.&#8221; United States v. Kent, 531 F.3d 642, 649 (8th Cir. 2008). The informant&#8217;s willingness to arrange a meeting and his accurate prediction of events also provided strong support to the veracity of the informant&#8217;s information. See United States v. Winarske, 715 F.3d 1063, 1067 (8th Cir. 2013) (&#8220;An informant may &#8230; prove himself to be a reliable source for law enforcement by providing predictive information about a meeting time or place.&#8221;); United States v. Manes, 603 F.3d 451, 456 (8th Cir. 2010) (reasoning the reliability of an informant&#8217;s information &#8220;is bolstered if the tip is corroborated not only by matching an identity or description, but also by accurately describing a suspect&#8217;s future behavior&#8221;). In this case, the time and location of the meeting place, the color of the car, the dent in its passenger-side door, and even the car&#8217;s make3 all point to the informant&#8217;s accuracy and truthfulness with regard to the driver&#8217;s identity.<\/p>\n<p>Even disregarding the mistaken identity, the informant told the officers that whoever the driver was, he would have drugs on him. This information, combined with the informant&#8217;s corroborated credibility, also justified a reasonable belief the driver had committed a crime.<\/p>\n<p>At the time Officer Gann made the stop, reasonable suspicion and even probable cause existed to believe the driver had committed a crime. This is more than enough to justify a stop. See Alabama v. White, 496 U.S. 325, 330 (1990) (&#8220;Reasonable suspicion is a less demanding standard than probable cause.&#8221;).<\/p><\/blockquote>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Based on an informant\u2019s story, the police were looking for Barefield in a particular car. They happened upon defendant Patrick at the appointed time and place near the informant in a car matching the description. A reasonable but mistaken belief &hellip; <a class=\"more-link\" href=\"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=15612\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[44,20,35],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-15612","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-informant-hearsay","category-probable-cause","category-reasonable-suspicion"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/15612","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=15612"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/15612\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":15613,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/15612\/revisions\/15613"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=15612"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=15612"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=15612"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}