Return of property denied despite the fact defendant\u2019s case was dismissed. Defendant\u2019s wife was his codefendant, and she was convicted, but she\u2019s litigating a 2255, so the evidence may still be needed by the government. United States v. Neighbors, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7023 (D. Kan. January 22, 2015).<\/p>\n
Defendant could not suppress recordings of telephone calls (1) made to him during an armed standoff and (2) from the jail. United States v. Headbird, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 180911 (D.Minn. December 22, 2014).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Return of property denied despite the fact defendant\u2019s case was dismissed. Defendant\u2019s wife was his codefendant, and she was convicted, but she\u2019s litigating a 2255, so the evidence may still be needed by the government. United States v. Neighbors, 2015 … Continue reading