Grabbing defendant’s arm and being pulled into defendant’s motel room when defendant tried to shut the door on the officer in the officer’s effort to arrest him for a minor misdemeanor for which defendant would be cited at best was an unlawful entry because this was not hot pursuit and the situation lacked exigent circumstances when balanced against the offense. State v. Johnson, 2007 Ohio 6146, 173 Ohio App. 3d 669, 880 N.E.2d 111 (9th Dist. 2007).*<\/p>\n
Michigan’s parole search statute requires “reasonable cause” which the court equates with Griffin<\/em><\/a>‘s “reasonable suspicion” requirement. United States v. O’Connor, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 85578 (E.D. Mich. November 20, 2007).*<\/p>\n Officers’ observations of defendant’s activities with a known drug dealer amount to probable cause. His lawful arrest gave further probable cause for a search warrant for his residence. State court ligitation against the city that plaintiff lost precluded a claim in federal court against the city’s employees under claim preclusion. Lyttle v. Killackey, 528 F. Supp. 2d 818 (N.D. Ill. 2007).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" b2evALnk.b2WPAutP Continue reading
\nUnited States v. Willis, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 85580 (E.D. Pa. November 20, 2007).*<\/p>\n