In the Tenth Circuit, merely being the driver of a rented car without a showing of approval from the renter or the rental agreement is a lack of standing in the car. United States v. Flores, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1615 (D. Utah January 7, 2015).<\/p>\n
Defendant had a motion to suppress heard and denied in 2013. Then the government obtained a new indictment. The motion to suppress is the same as the earlier one, and it\u2019s denied, too. United States v. Murray, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2028 (N.D. Ga. January 7, 2015).*<\/p>\n
Despite minor inconsistencies between the officer\u2019s testimony and initial reports, the court finds him credible that he stopped defendant\u2019s BMW for not having a valid license plate (a \u201cSovereign Nation\u201d plate). United States v. Beck, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 179799 (D. Nev. November 14, 2014).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
In the Tenth Circuit, merely being the driver of a rented car without a showing of approval from the renter or the rental agreement is a lack of standing in the car. United States v. Flores, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS … Continue reading