Reasonable suspicion for a stop 70 miles from the border was supported by the fact the car had crossed into the U.S. at San Ysidro twice in 12 hours. United States v. Garcia-Grimshaw, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 173631 (S.D. Cal. December 16, 2014).*<\/p>\n
Defense counsel was not ineffective for withdrawing a motion to challenge the legality of his arrest on two grounds: no legal basis for it, and strategy to embrace the statement made after the arrest to show a lesser-included offense. Both were reasonable. Brunner v. State<\/a>, 2014 Tenn. Crim. App. LEXIS 1120 (December 15, 2014).*<\/p>\n Defense counsel was not ineffective for not pursuing a motion to suppress her stop because there was reasonable suspicion for the initial stop and continuing it, and it would clearly lose. State v. Stewart<\/a>, 2014 UT App 289, 2014 Utah App. LEXIS 293 (December 11, 2014).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Reasonable suspicion for a stop 70 miles from the border was supported by the fact the car had crossed into the U.S. at San Ysidro twice in 12 hours. United States v. Garcia-Grimshaw, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 173631 (S.D. Cal. … Continue reading