{"id":14470,"date":"2014-12-01T00:35:07","date_gmt":"2014-12-01T05:35:07","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=14470"},"modified":"2014-11-29T18:36:14","modified_gmt":"2014-11-29T23:36:14","slug":"ak-the-exclusionary-rule-does-not-apply-in-dl-suspension-proceedings-except-where-there-is-conduct-shocking-to-the-conscience","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=14470","title":{"rendered":"AK: The exclusionary rule does not apply in DL suspension proceedings, except where there is conduct shocking to the conscience"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>The exclusionary rule does not apply in drivers license suspension proceedings, except where there is conduct shocking to the conscience. Here, it&#8217;s not. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.courtrecords.alaska.gov\/webdocs\/opinions\/ops\/sp-6970.pdf\">Garibay v. State, Dept. of Administration, Division of Motor Vehicles<\/a>, 2014 Alas. LEXIS 222 (November 28, 2014).<\/p>\n<p>There is no state law privacy interest in electric company usage records for a grow operation. The state supreme court had already upheld access by subpoena to telephone records. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.publications.ojd.state.or.us\/docs\/A150323.pdf\">State v. Sparks<\/a>, 267 Ore. App. ___, 2014 Ore. App. LEXIS 1650 (November 26, 2014).*<\/p>\n<p>Defendant was seen standing in the parking lot of a high crime area at night talking to somebody, and he looked startled and ran on seeing the police car. That was reasonable suspicion. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.la-fcca.org\/opiniongrid\/opinionpdf\/2014%20KA%200612%20Decision%20Appeal.pdf\">State v. Robertson<\/a>, 2014 La. App. LEXIS 2846 (La.App. 1 Cir. November 25, 2014).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The exclusionary rule does not apply in drivers license suspension proceedings, except where there is conduct shocking to the conscience. Here, it&#8217;s not. Garibay v. State, Dept. of Administration, Division of Motor Vehicles, 2014 Alas. LEXIS 222 (November 28, 2014). &hellip; <a class=\"more-link\" href=\"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=14470\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[46,14,42,18,35],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-14470","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-due-process","category-exclusionary-rule","category-informational-privacy","category-reasonable-expectation-of-privacy","category-reasonable-suspicion"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/14470","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=14470"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/14470\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":14471,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/14470\/revisions\/14471"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=14470"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=14470"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=14470"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}