{"id":14220,"date":"2014-11-17T01:00:54","date_gmt":"2014-11-17T06:00:54","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=14220"},"modified":"2014-11-16T18:11:45","modified_gmt":"2014-11-16T23:11:45","slug":"tx13-neither-automobile-exception-nor-search-incident-permit-warrantless-blood-draw-for-dui","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=14220","title":{"rendered":"TX13: Neither automobile exception nor search incident permit warrantless blood draw for DUI"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Exigent circumstances didn\u2019t justify the warrantless blood draw. Neither the automobile exception nor the search incident doctrine can be used to search a person\u2019s blood. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.search.txcourts.gov\/SearchMedia.aspx?MediaVersionID=f5437a74-b050-4891-a101-1d6ea5b25c22&#038;MediaID=9ad662b0-b25e-447f-89ba-1b12864f8cae&#038;coa=%22%20+%20this.CurrentWebState.CurrentCourt%20+%20@%22&#038;DT=Opinion\">Smith v. State<\/a>, 2014 Tex. App. LEXIS 12372 (Tex. App.\u2013 Corpus Christi-Edinburg November 13, 2014):<br \/>\n<!--more--><\/p>\n<blockquote><p>The State argues that the warrantless blood draw is justified by the automobile exception. See California v. Carney, 471 U.S. 386 (1985); Carroll v. United States, 267 U.S. 132 (1925). The automobile exception turns on a reduced expectation of privacy in a vehicle. See South Dakota v. Opperman, 428 U.S. 364, 367 (1976) (holding that &#8220;[b]esides the element of mobility, less rigorous warrant requirements govern because the expectation of privacy with respect to one&#8217;s automobile is significantly less than that relating to one&#8217;s home or office&#8221;). These reduced expectations of privacy derive from the pervasive regulation of vehicles capable of traveling on the public highways. Cady v. Dombrowski, 413 U.S. 433, 440-41 (1973).<\/p>\n<p>The State has provided no authority that applies the automobile exception to DWI blood draws. Instead, we find contrary authority. A compelled physical intrusion beneath a defendant&#8217;s skin and into his veins to obtain a sample of his blood for use as evidence in a criminal investigation is such an invasion of bodily integrity that it implicates an individual&#8217;s &#8220;most personal and deep-rooted expectations of privacy.&#8221; Winston v. Lee, 470 U.S. 753, 760 (1985); see also Skinner v. Ry. Labor Executives&#8217; Ass&#8217;n., 489 U.S. 602, 616 (1989). While we agree with the State that a driver has a reduced expectation of privacy, this reduced expectation extends to items within the car that person is driving, not inside the person&#8217;s body. See Carney, 471 U.S. at 392. A warrantless blood draw is not justified by the automobile exception.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Exigent circumstances didn\u2019t justify the warrantless blood draw. Neither the automobile exception nor the search incident doctrine can be used to search a person\u2019s blood. Smith v. State, 2014 Tex. App. LEXIS 12372 (Tex. App.\u2013 Corpus Christi-Edinburg November 13, 2014):<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[36,55,26],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-14220","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-automobile-exception","category-drug-testing","category-search-incident"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/14220","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=14220"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/14220\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":14221,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/14220\/revisions\/14221"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=14220"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=14220"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=14220"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}