{"id":1400,"date":"2007-10-01T06:22:09","date_gmt":"2007-10-01T06:22:09","guid":{"rendered":""},"modified":"-0001-11-30T00:00:00","modified_gmt":"2007-10-01T06:22:09","slug":"en-US","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=1400","title":{"rendered":"Seizure of a student also governed by <em>T.L.O.<\/em>"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Seizure of a student could be found unreasonable, but the state of law was unclear at the time, so qualified immunity bars a \u00a7 1983 claim. Defelice v. Warner, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 72059 (D. Del. September 28, 2007):<\/p>\n<p>Although the Supreme Court has decided several cases involving searches of students, it has not addressed seizures of students. See <em>Bisignano<\/em>, 113 F. Supp. 2d at 596. Regarding seizures of students, therefore, the court is only guided by the Supreme Court&#8217;s general statements about the relationship between Fourth Amendment rights and the school setting. The Supreme Court has stated that &#8220;Fourth Amendment rights &#8230; are different in public schools than elsewhere [and that] the &#8216;reasonableness&#8217; inquiry cannot disregard the schools&#8217; custodial and tutelary responsibility for children. <a href=\"http:\/\/caselaw.lp.findlaw.com\/scripts\/getcase.pl?court=us&amp;vol=000&amp;invol=U10263\"><em>Vernonia School Dist. 47J v. Acton<\/em><\/a>, 515 U.S. 646, 656 (1995). &#8220;In [<a href=\"http:\/\/caselaw.lp.findlaw.com\/scripts\/getcase.pl?court=us&amp;vol=469&amp;invol=325\"><em>New Jersey v. T.L.O.<\/em><\/a>], [the Supreme Court] reaffirmed that the constitutional rights of students in public school are not automatically coextensive with the rights of adults in other settings.&#8221; <a href=\"http:\/\/caselaw.lp.findlaw.com\/scripts\/getcase.pl?court=us&amp;vol=478&amp;invol=675\"><em>Bethel School Dist. No. 403 v. Fraser<\/em><\/a>, 478 U.S. 675, 682 (1986). The Supreme Court also stated that <em>T.L.O.<\/em> emphasized that the nature of the &#8220;State&#8217;s power over schoolchildren &#8230; permit[s] a degree of supervision and control that could not be exercised over free adults.&#8221; <em>Vernonia<\/em>, 515 U.S. at 655 (citing TLO).<\/p>\n<p>The circuit courts that have dealt with seizures in the school setting have concluded that the reasonableness standard, set forth by the Supreme Court in <em>T.L.O.<\/em>, applies equally to seizures of a student&#8217;s person. See <em>Shuman v. Penn Manor School Dist.<\/em>, 422 F.3d 141, 148 (3d Cir. 2005) (&#8220;[S]eizures in the public school context are governed by the reasonableness standard, giving special consideration to the goals and responsibilities of our public schools.&#8221;); <em>Wallace v. Batavia School Dist. 101<\/em>, 68 F.3d 1010, 1014 (7th Cir. 1995) (&#8220;[I]n the context of a public school, a teacher or administrator who seizes a student does so in violation of the Fourth Amendment only when the restriction of liberty is unreasonable under the circumstances then existing and apparent.&#8221;); <em>Hassan v. Lubbock Indep. School Dist.<\/em>, 55 F.3d 1075, 1079 (5th Cir. 1995) (&#8220;[T]he reasonableness of seizures must be determined in light of all of the circumstances &#8230;.&#8221;); <em>Edwards v. Rees<\/em>, 883 F.2d 882, 884 (10th Cir. 1989) (&#8220;the same considerations which moved the Supreme Court to apply a relaxed Fourth Amendment standard in cases involving school searches support applying the standard in school seizure cases.&#8221;).<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>b2evALnk.b2WPAutP <a class=\"more-link\" href=\"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=1400\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"pingsdone","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1400","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1400","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=1400"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1400\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=1400"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=1400"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=1400"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}