An FBI agent was under investigation for bribery for selling information about an investigation. The government showed probable cause for e-mail and cell phone search warrants. The SW cross-referenced Attachment II when it should have said III, and that was an inadvertent error subject to the good faith exception. United States v. Lustyik, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 143039 (S.D. N.Y. September 29, 2014).<\/p>\n
Defense counsel was not ineffective for not arguing the suppression motion slightly differently because he wouldn\u2019t have prevailed in any event. Blackley v. United States, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 142994 (S.D. Ala. September 11, 2014).*<\/p>\n
Based on all the information collected, the police showed probable cause for a search warrant for a 36 year old defendant\u2019s computer for nude pictures of a 16 year old girl he was having sex with and photographing it. United States v. Brackett, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 143199 (D. Neb. August 15, 2014).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
An FBI agent was under investigation for bribery for selling information about an investigation. The government showed probable cause for e-mail and cell phone search warrants. The SW cross-referenced Attachment II when it should have said III, and that was … Continue reading