{"id":12956,"date":"2014-08-16T15:36:25","date_gmt":"2014-08-16T20:36:25","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=12956"},"modified":"2014-08-16T11:37:51","modified_gmt":"2014-08-16T16:37:51","slug":"d-d-c-iac-claim-fails-on-pretrial-issue-defendant-agreed-to","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=12956","title":{"rendered":"D.D.C.: IAC claim fails on pretrial issue defendant agreed to"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Defendant fully participated in the decision not to pursue a Fourth Amendment claim (that wouldn\u2019t win anyway) with a full explanation, so he can\u2019t complain now in a 2255. <a href=\"https:\/\/ecf.dcd.uscourts.gov\/cgi-bin\/show_public_doc?2013cr0094-31\">United States v. Wright<\/a>, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 110991 (D. D.C. August 12, 2014).*<\/p>\n<p>In a production of child pornography conviction, the defendant did not challenge a computer search condition as a part of his supervised release (n. 21). <a href=\"http:\/\/media.ca1.uscourts.gov\/pdf.opinions\/12-1801P-01A.pdf\">United States v. Ramos<\/a>, 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 15537 (1st Cir. August 13, 2014).*<\/p>\n<p>This stop at the Sarita immigration checkpoint quickly developed into reasonable suspicion. United States v. Depaula, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 111559 (S.D. Tex. August 11, 2014).*<\/p>\n<p>Defendant\u2019s motion to suppress identifies nothing to be suppressed so it\u2019s denied. United States v. De Jesus Sanchez, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 112219 (D. Minn. July 21, 2014).*<\/p>\n<p>Defendant\u2019s 2255 arguments about his alleged defective state search warrant that led to his federal prosecution would never prevail on the merits, so he\u2019s denied relief. Schaff v. United States, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 111552 (S.D. Ga. March 24, 2014).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Defendant fully participated in the decision not to pursue a Fourth Amendment claim (that wouldn\u2019t win anyway) with a full explanation, so he can\u2019t complain now in a 2255. United States v. Wright, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 110991 (D. D.C. &hellip; <a class=\"more-link\" href=\"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=12956\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[23,35],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-12956","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-ineffective-assistance","category-reasonable-suspicion"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/12956","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=12956"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/12956\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":12957,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/12956\/revisions\/12957"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=12956"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=12956"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=12956"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}