{"id":12897,"date":"2014-08-11T08:07:50","date_gmt":"2014-08-11T13:07:50","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=12897"},"modified":"2014-08-12T20:08:23","modified_gmt":"2014-08-13T01:08:23","slug":"in-pc-required-to-install-a-gps-device","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=12897","title":{"rendered":"IN: PC required to install a GPS device"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Probable cause is required to install a GPS device on a vehicle. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.in.gov\/judiciary\/opinions\/pdf\/08081408pdm.pdf\">Keeylen v. State<\/a>, 2014 Ind. App. LEXIS 384 (August 8, 2014):<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Still, we readily conclude that probable cause, not reasonable suspicion, is the standard that must be established before the police may engage in a &#8220;search&#8221; by installing a GPS device on a vehicle and monitoring the vehicle&#8217;s movements by means of such a device. See United States v. Ortiz, 878 F. Supp. 2d 515, 533 (E.D. Pa. 2012) (observing that &#8220;the intrusion on Fourth Amendment privacy interests occasioned by GPS tracker installation and monitoring is substantial&#8221; and that there were no legitimate law enforcement needs to use such devices beyond the normal need for law enforcement and rejecting the government&#8217;s argument that reasonable suspicion was sufficient to support installation and use of GPS tracking device); United States v. Katzin, 732 F.3d 187, 201 (3d Cir. 2013) (&#8220;we hold that\u2014absent some highly specific circumstances not present in this case\u2014the police cannot justify a warrantless GPS search with reasonable suspicion alone.&#8221;), reh&#8217;g en banc granted, opinion vacated; State v. Sullivan, 2014 WL 1347978, 2014-Ohio-1443 (Ohio Ct. App., Apr. 3, 2014) (concluding that the installation and monitoring of a GPS device could not be justified by a showing of simple reasonable suspicion).<\/p><\/blockquote>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Probable cause is required to install a GPS device on a vehicle. Keeylen v. State, 2014 Ind. App. LEXIS 384 (August 8, 2014): Still, we readily conclude that probable cause, not reasonable suspicion, is the standard that must be established &hellip; <a class=\"more-link\" href=\"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=12897\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[17,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-12897","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-gps-tracking-data","category-probable-cause"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/12897","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=12897"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/12897\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":12912,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/12897\/revisions\/12912"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=12897"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=12897"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=12897"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}