Police observation of a controlled buy is justification for a traffic stop. United States v. Cooper, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 105617 (N.D. Cal. July 31, 2014).*<\/p>\n
D.C. helped set up defendant\u2019s computer system, and defendant was downloading child pornography. The police got wind of that via the IP address and they went to D.C.\u2019s house with a warrant. They found nothing but found out that defendant was using D.C.\u2019s signal. Suppression denied. Somehow he was arguing that he had standing to challenge the search of his neighbor\u2019s house. United States v. Heiland, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 105700 (W.D. Wis. July 31, 2014).*<\/p>\n
2255 petitioner challenges a failure to file a motion to suppress without identifying a single issue that wasn\u2019t raised, let alone would win. United States v. Fiel, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 106088 (E.D. Va. July 31, 2014).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Police observation of a controlled buy is justification for a traffic stop. United States v. Cooper, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 105617 (N.D. Cal. July 31, 2014).* D.C. helped set up defendant\u2019s computer system, and defendant was downloading child pornography. The … Continue reading