{"id":11943,"date":"2014-06-09T03:58:13","date_gmt":"2014-06-09T08:58:13","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=11943"},"modified":"2014-06-09T03:58:13","modified_gmt":"2014-06-09T08:58:13","slug":"ks-failure-to-corroborate-anonymous-informants-was-a-complete-lack-of-pc-for-gfe","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=11943","title":{"rendered":"KS: Failure to corroborate anonymous informants was a complete lack of PC for GFE"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>A police car was stolen and left in a ditch apparently with blood and hair left on it. Three anonymous calls linked defendant to the theft. He first agreed to come in and give samples and then didn\u2019t show. A  search warrant for blood and hair was sought. The warrant had no factual basis to link to defendant, and the good faith exception could not be applied here. There was no corroboration, no nothing, and the issuing magistrate\u2019s conclusion was based on an assumption that was a mere \u201crubberstamping\u201d of the conclusion of the police prohibited in Aguilar. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.kscourts.org\/Cases-and-Opinions\/opinions\/SupCt\/2014\/20140606\/102749.pdf\">State v. Powell<\/a>, 2014 Kan. LEXIS 269 (June 6, 2014).<\/p>\n<p>The vehicle search incident in this case occurred two days before Gant was decided, and Kansas codified Belton. The good faith exception of reliance on a statute (Krull) applies to this case, and the search will not be suppressed. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.kscourts.org\/Cases-and-Opinions\/opinions\/SupCt\/2014\/20140606\/107673.pdf\">State v. Pettay<\/a>, 2014 Kan. LEXIS 272 (June 6, 2014).<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>A police car was stolen and left in a ditch apparently with blood and hair left on it. Three anonymous calls linked defendant to the theft. He first agreed to come in and give samples and then didn\u2019t show. A &hellip; <a class=\"more-link\" href=\"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=11943\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[14,11,44],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-11943","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-exclusionary-rule","category-good-faith-exception","category-informant-hearsay"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11943","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=11943"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11943\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":11944,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11943\/revisions\/11944"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=11943"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=11943"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=11943"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}