A line by line dissection of a search warrant affidavit is inappropriate; what does it say as a whole with a common sense reading. \u201cBrummett’s interpretation strains linguistic reality.\u201d It was not so lacking in probable cause that the exclusionary rule should apply. United States v. Brummett, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 70437 (E.D. Ky. May 2, 2014).*<\/p>\n
There was probable cause for defendant\u2019s arrest for being involved in a shooting based on his dress and location right after the call, his being out of breath, near a discarded hoodie that would have explained why his t-shirt was dry in the cold rain. In custody he confessed to the shooting. State v. McLemore<\/a>, 2014-Ohio-2116, 2014 Ohio App. LEXIS 2058 (9th Cir. May 19, 2014).*<\/p>\n Asking about carrying weapons in Oregon requires that there be reasonable suspicion. State v. Jimenez<\/a>, 263 Or. App. __, 2014 Ore. App. LEXIS 684 (May 21, 2014).*<\/p>\n Asking for consent to search during a traffic stop requires reasonable suspicion. State v. Pichardo<\/a>, 263 Or. App. __, 2014 Ore. App. LEXIS 685 (May 21, 2014).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" A line by line dissection of a search warrant affidavit is inappropriate; what does it say as a whole with a common sense reading. \u201cBrummett’s interpretation strains linguistic reality.\u201d It was not so lacking in probable cause that the exclusionary … Continue reading