When a motion to suppress is denied as to one defendant, the law of the case doctrine applies and requires it be denied as to others [except possibly where it was on standing or something like that]. United States v. Chidester, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 68282 (N.D. W.Va. April 29, 2014).<\/p>\n
Defendant\u2019s adult son lived with her and was on probation. Probation officers did a probation search and found evidence of defendant\u2019s drug use. They applied for a search warrant and returned and searched her purse. The purse was within the scope of the search warrant for \u201call personal property\u201d and could be searched. People v. Webb<\/a>, 2014 CO 36, 2014 Colo. LEXIS 361 (May 19, 2014).*<\/p>\n Defendant\u2019s stop for speeding was objectively reasonable and pretext doesn\u2019t matter. United States v. Davis, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 69170 (D. Nev. April 30, 2014).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" When a motion to suppress is denied as to one defendant, the law of the case doctrine applies and requires it be denied as to others [except possibly where it was on standing or something like that]. United States v. … Continue reading