{"id":11409,"date":"2014-05-03T10:52:32","date_gmt":"2014-05-03T15:52:32","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=11409"},"modified":"2014-05-03T10:54:36","modified_gmt":"2014-05-03T15:54:36","slug":"or-search-of-home-requires-more-than-just-pc-there-must-be-a-warrant-or-warrant-exception","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=11409","title":{"rendered":"OR: Search of home requires more than just PC; there must be a warrant or warrant exception"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Defendant argued the search of her bedroom was without consent, therefore invalid. The trial court found  probable cause and sustained the search. Reversed: Without an exception to the warrant requirement, the search was invalid, and the state argues none. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.publications.ojd.state.or.us\/docs\/A151400.pdf\">State v. Groling<\/a>, 262 Or. App. __, 2014 Ore. App. LEXIS 614 (April 30, 2014).<\/p>\n<p>Officers had probable cause to stop and search defendant\u2019s car, including a brown pouch found inside. They had information about the pouch already, but they didn\u2019t expect to find it in the car when it was stopped. But they did, and that&#8217;s good enough for the automobile exception. United States v. Mapuatuli, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 61299 (D. Haw. May 2, 2014).*<\/p>\n<p>Fleeing a traffic stop at high speeds and finally bailing out of the car and running away carrying a bag is reasonable suspicion. United States v. Williams, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 61358 (M.D. Fla. April 3, 2014).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Defendant argued the search of her bedroom was without consent, therefore invalid. The trial court found probable cause and sustained the search. Reversed: Without an exception to the warrant requirement, the search was invalid, and the state argues none. State &hellip; <a class=\"more-link\" href=\"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=11409\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[36,20,18,35,4,37],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-11409","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-automobile-exception","category-probable-cause","category-reasonable-expectation-of-privacy","category-reasonable-suspicion","category-stop-and-frisk","category-warrant-requirement"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11409","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=11409"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11409\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":11411,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11409\/revisions\/11411"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=11409"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=11409"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=11409"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}