S.D.Ill.: Search of car after stop for obstructed windshield valid under 4A despite state law saying officers couldn’t search

Illinois law holds that a car cannot be searched for violation of the windshield obstruction statute. Defendant’s car ultimately was, and the court finds that the search comported with the Fourth Amendment and state law didn’t grant greater rights here. United States v. Douglas, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 255997 (S.D. Ill. Dec. 10, 2025).

(from 7/23/25) In a convoluted case, a liquor enforcement inspection warrant was executed during a business rush, allegedly in retaliation for asking for a warrant. Also, it appears the scope of the warrant exceeds the agency’s authority over liquor control. This part of the motion to dismiss is denied pending discovery which can help clear things up. Generis Ent., LLC v. Donley, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 138226 (E.D. Mich. July 8, 2025),* reconsideration denied 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 254695 (E.D. Mich. Dec. 9, 2025).*

There was no reasonable suspicion to continue the stop. Defendant’s pulling over before the blue lights came on isn’t of much value here. Neither is nervousness or past drug charges. United States v. Catron, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 254647 (E.D. Okla. Nov. 13, 2025).*

Pretrial detention is governed by the Fourth Amendment, post-trial by the Fourteenth Amendment. Hawkes v. Alconcel, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 254426 (D. Haw. Dec. 9, 2025).*

This entry was posted in Administrative search, Arrest or entry on arrest, Reasonable suspicion, Reasonableness. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.