CA11: Week’s delay in getting SW for cell phone was reasonable; def in custody and didn’t ask for it back.

The warrant for defendant’s cell phone wasn’t issued for a week, but the delay was reasonable. He was in jail with a diminished privacy interest, and he didn’t ask for it back. United States v. Watson, 2024 U.S. App. LEXIS 20894 (11th Cir. Aug. 19, 2024). [Like a man in custody knows he has to ask for his cell phone back when he can’t even possess it.]

Defendant was seized on the street when he was blocked in by two officers and a car and would have to brush past them to get away. This stop was without reasonable suspicion, and it is suppressed. United States v. Dozier, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 146790 (E.D.N.Y. Aug. 16, 2024).*

The court declines to require under the Commonwealth Charter of Rights that a person requested to give a BAC sample be advised of the right to refuse. El Pueblo de P.R. v. De Jesús, 2024 TSPR 87, 2024 PR Sup. LEXIS 84 (Aug. 12, 2024).* (Translation by Google.)

Defendant can’t raise an illegal search warrant issue on appeal without putting the search warrant materials in the record. Brown v. State, 2024 Nev. Unpub. LEXIS 629 (Aug. 14, 2024).*

This entry was posted in Burden of proof, Cell phones, Reasonable suspicion, Reasonableness, State constitution, Warrant execution. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.