FL1: Officer’s comment on the defendant’s exercise of his right to refuse to consent violated Fourth Amendment

Officer’s comment on the defendant’s exercise of his right to refuse to consent is usually reversible error, but it is subject to harmless error review. Here, however, it cannot be said beyond doubt that the comment in the context of a self-defense claim was harmless. Reversed. Bravo v. State, 65 So. 3d 621 (Fla. 1st DCA 2011).*

“Does an officer have reasonable suspicion to effect a traffic stop when he conducts a computer check of a car’s tag and learns that the tag is registered to the same make of car, but to one of a different color? We agree with courts in Indiana and Georgia and hold that under these circumstances an officer may lawfully make a traffic stop under the Fourth Amendment of the United States Constitution.” Aders v. State, 67 So. 3d 368 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011).

Defendant’s Gant argument for the first time at oral argument was waived. The trial was five months after Gant, and it was never mentioned. State v. Lee, 2011 Wash. App. LEXIS 1747 (July 26, 2011).*

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.