W.D.Wis.: Jurisdictional issue in SW wasn’t enough to suppress here

In a domestic terrorism investigation, USMJs have the authority to issue search warrants outside their court’s jurisdiction. Defendant disputes that this investigation was not that, but it’s close enough. Even if the officers were mistaken, the court won’t suppress an otherwise valid warrant for this mistake. United States v. Morgan, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 120864 (W.D. Wis. June 5, 2024), adopted, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 119580 (W.D. Wis. July 9, 2024).

Defense counsel didn’t raise a Bond issue on lifting a suitcase to see how heavy it was, and this wasn’t ineffective assistance of counsel. “Defense Counsel either had not thought of this theory at the time, or having thought of it, had decided not to pursue it. As the record shows Defense Counsel’s conduct was reasonable at the time, the Court rejects Mr. Fernandez’s contrary, distorted-by-hindsight, reasoning.” Bond involved squeezing the luggage, not lifting it, and that’s a difference. Fernandez v. United States, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 121384 (D.N.M. July 10, 2024).*

On a motion to reconsider, there was ample probable cause from the historical facts to justify the search. United States v. Reyes-Valdez, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 120725 (E.D. Pa. July 10, 2024).*

This entry was posted in Exclusionary rule, Good faith exception, Ineffective assistance, Neutral and detached magistrate, Probable cause, Warrant execution. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.