E.D.Ky.: No PC for SW to test keys in a lock; only RS at most

Keys were found on the passenger seat of a pickup searched parked where a warrant was executed. A separate search warrant was obtained for the keys to determine whether they worked in the house lock. Plain view was argued. But, “[h]ere, there was nothing about the keys that immediately indicated they were associated with criminal activity. At most the officers had reasonable suspicion that the keys would unlock the Honey Jay residence, but reasonable suspicion is insufficient to invoke the plain view doctrine. Arizona v. Hicks, 480 U.S. 321, 324-35 (1987).” The motion to suppress is granted. United States v. Howard, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 104398 (E.D. Ky. June 12, 2024).

Defendant pled conditionally and overturned the search in his case on appeal. On remand, he was reindicted for additional offenses. He cannot show sufficient prosecutorial vindictiveness to prevail. He has an onerous burden, and the fact of indictment alone doesn’t carry it. United States v. Lewis, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 104400 (E.D. Ky. June 12, 2024).*

Defendant can’t show that the affidavit was either false or materially false, so a Franks hearing is denied. United States v. Men, U.S. Dist. LEXIS 104350 (W.D. Wis. June 10, 2024).*

This entry was posted in Franks doctrine, Plain view, feel, smell. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.