CA6: No REP in “Walmart pay app” purchases; it’s a third-party record

Defendant had no reasonable expectation of privacy in his “Walmart pay app” purchases from a third party subpoena of things he used in a bank robbery shortly thereafter. “Therefore, the third-party doctrine still applies to business records that might reveal information such as telephone numbers and bank records, and Carpenter does not suggest otherwise. 138 S. Ct. at 2220, 2222.” United States v. Whipple, 2024 U.S. App. LEXIS 2969 (6th Cir. Feb. 8, 2024).

The search warrant for BAC results was obtained without exploiting any prior illegality. State v. McMickle, 2024 Iowa Sup. LEXIS 12 (Feb. 9, 2024);* State v. Laub, 2024 Iowa Sup. LEXIS 17 (Feb. 9, 2024).*

Collective knowledge for reasonable suspicion was shown. United States v. Wahl, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 23221 (D.S.D. Feb. 7, 2024).*

This entry was posted in Collective knowledge, Independent source, Third Party Doctrine. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.