M.D.Pa.: Car company with security interest had claim for alleged illegal disposal of seized car

A motorist was stopped and searched and his car was seized, towed, and impounded. Later it was sold by the towing company for expenses. Toyota had a security interest in it. Toyota stated a claim for loss of the car. Toyota Motor Credit Corp. v. Borough of Wyo., 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 202072 (M.D. Pa. Nov. 9, 2023).

There was no license plate on the back of defendant’s car. Once stopped, and the officer approached, he could see a temporary tag in the rear window, but it was only visible from a few feet away. That didn’t comply with state law. State v. Core, 2023-Ohio-4061 (2d Dist. Nov. 9, 2023).*

The officer here saw what was believed to be a hand to hand drug transaction at a motel. As the officer approached, defendant walked into the hotel property and wandered around. It turned out he wasn’t a guest there. His stop was with reasonable suspicion. State v. Partin, 2023-Ohio-4056 (2d Dist. Nov. 9, 2023).*

This entry was posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Reasonable suspicion, Seizure. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.