E.D.Ky.: Overnight guest ordered out no longer had REP

Defendant was an overnight guest, but the homeowner told him to get out and called the police on him because he was tearing the place up. “The Court finds it doubtful that “society is prepared to recognize as reasonable” Starghill’s subjective expectation of privacy when he refused to leave Mullins’s home after being explicitly told to. Just because Starghill had stayed the night did not grant him a reasonable expectation of privacy in the bedroom in perpetuum.” United States v. Starghill, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 200609 (E.D. Ky. Nov. 8, 2023).

Defendant was charged with PPP fraud under the CARES Act for using money for his business to buy a vacation home. The search warrant for email and other records was based in part on a grand jury indictment which itself shows probable cause. It was also not stale and was particular. United States v. Perkins, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 200145 (M.D. Pa. Nov. 7, 2023).*

The standard for voluntariness of consent is the same under the Fourth Amendment and the state constitution. This was consensual. S. v. D.S. (In re D.), 329 Or App 96, 2023 Ore. App. LEXIS 1102 (Nov. 8, 2023).*

No CoA for appeal of a 2254 for defense counsel’s alleged failure to challenge CSLI. Dunnington v. Lumpkin, 2023 U.S. App. LEXIS 29777 (5th Cir. Nov. 7, 2023).*

This entry was posted in Cell site location information, Probable cause, Reasonable expectation of privacy, State constitution. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.