IL: Pills in knotted baggie were “immediately apparent” for plain view

Plain view: “In the case before us, the evidence showed that it was immediately apparent to Officer Yanez, i.e., he had probable cause to believe, that the white pills in the blue-tinted, knotted baggie were illegal narcotics based on his narcotics training and over 100 narcotics arrest during his six-year career. He specifically testified: ‘From my experience, the way I have seen narcotics packaged, I believe[d] it to be narcotics.’” People v. Mallett, 2023 IL App (1st) 220920 (Sep. 26, 2023).*

“Ultimately, Officer Roach observed specific behavior that, taken together, gave him a particularized and objective basis to suspect that criminal activity was afoot. Viewing those collective observations in light of Officer Roach’s professional experience—as we must—it was reasonable for Officer Roach to seize the occupants of the vehicle for a short time longer to conduct the minimally intrusive investigatory dog sniff. Thus, we conclude that the totality of the circumstances—the whole picture—provided reasonable suspicion to prolong the traffic stop to conduct the dog sniff.” Canonge v. State, 2023 Ind. App. LEXIS 267 (Sep. 25, 2023).*

“Further, the law that the disproportionate use of force against a non-resisting suspect is excessive was clearly established by the time of Plaintiff’s arrest in April 2019.” Neira v. Gualtieri, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 171162 (M.D. Fla. Sep. 26, 2023).*

This entry was posted in Excessive force, Plain view, feel, smell, Qualified immunity, Reasonable suspicion. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.