W.D.Tex.: Right to non-recording and distribution of jail calls to attorneys was clearly established

Plaintiff’s complaint against the jail for recording attorney-client calls and transmitting them to law enforcement and prosecutors stated a claim for relief that was clearly established. Hurdsman v. Gleason, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 163081 (W.D. Tex. Sep. 14, 2023).

Defendant’s 2255 Franks ineffective assistance of counsel claim fails. Information came from another law enforcement agency, and it wasn’t even recklessly false. Zareck v. United States, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 161681 (W.D. Pa. Sep. 12, 2023).*

2255 petitioner argues that defense counsel’s losing IP address privacy argument was not properly phrased, and that’s ineffective assistance. Even restated, it was a loser. Trader v. United States, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 162487 (S.D. Fla. Sep. 13, 2023).*

Defendant’s possession of flash drives and other electronics was reasonable suspicion he violated terms of supervised release. United States v. Berry, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 162466 (E.D. Mo. July 21, 2023),* adopted, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 161204 (E.D. Mo. Sep. 12, 2023).*

This entry was posted in Ineffective assistance, Privileges, Probation / Parole search, Qualified immunity. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.