OH7: Anticipatory warrant for prostitution

The anticipatory warrant here was for prostitution. State v. Zhang, 2023-Ohio-3173, 2023 Ohio App. LEXIS 3129 (7th Dist. Sep. 7, 2023).

“The use of a drug-sniffing dog during a routine traffic stop that does not prolong the stop does not violate the Fourth Amendment.” United States v. Hernandez-Quintero, 2023 U.S. App. LEXIS 23847 (10th Cir. Sep. 8, 2023).

There was reasonable suspicion for defendant’s stop, and it was reasonable to pat him down for weapons. United States v. Sable, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 158598 (S.D.N.Y. Sep. 7, 2023).*

There was reasonable suspicion for defendant’s stop because the officer had knowledge of past criminal conduct. United States v. Haynes, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 158346 (W.D. Ky. Sep. 7, 2023).*

This entry was posted in Anticipatory warrant, Dog sniff, Reasonable suspicion. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.