OR: All electronic devices seized to be searched require PC showing

The affidavit for warrant did not show justification for search of all the electronic devices that were seized and then searched. State v. Cannon, 299 Ore. App. 616, 450 P.3d 567 (2019). (Probable cause was conceded as to some devices.) State v. Cantrell, 327 Or. App. 548 (Aug. 23, 2023).

Defendant’s only challenge to the search warrant is its probable cause, but the good faith exception isn’t discussed, and that saves the search in any event. United States v. Peterson, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 146946 (E.D. La. Aug. 21, 2023).*

Officers entered defendant’s garage to talk to him, and that’s curtilage. There was no legitimate law enforcement purpose for this warrantless entry, and the exclusionary rule should apply. United States v. Ramer, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 147146 (N.D. Ind. Aug. 22, 2023).*

Defendant consented to search of the car he was in, no matter what his supervised release conditions provided for. United States v. Degrate, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 147295 (E.D. Mich. Aug. 22, 2023).*

This entry was posted in Computer and cloud searches, Consent, Curtilage, Good faith exception, Probable cause. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.