CA6: Standing required in a § 1983 case

Plaintiff didn’t have standing to raise someone else’s rights in a § 1983 case. Appeal dismissed. Jordan v. City of Toledo, 2023 U.S. App. LEXIS 22063 (6th Cir. Aug. 21, 2023).

Drug officers’ executing search warrants and stealing property was charged as a RICO violation. Reversed on Puerto Rico law supporting it. United States v. Muñoz-Martinez, 2023 U.S. App. LEXIS 22091 (1st Cir. Aug. 22, 2023).*

The court affirms the district court’s finding of mistake of fact over a construction lane that wasn’t objectively reasonable. United States v. Potter, 2023 U.S. App. LEXIS 22087 (1st Cir. Aug. 22, 2023).*

“This grand jury qualifies as an independent intermediary, whose ‘decision breaks the chain of causation’ and, absent an exception to the doctrine, insulates Iden and Brauchle from liability as the initiating parties.” Trevino v. Iden, 2023 U.S. App. LEXIS 22045 (5th Cir. Aug. 21, 2023).*

This entry was posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Reasonableness, Standing. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.