W.D.Tex.: State SW doesn’t deprive federal court of jurisdiction

Federal courts had jurisdiction over defendant’s criminal case despite his initial arrest after execution of a state search warrant. Calzada v. United States, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 86622 (W.D. Tex. Apr. 13, 2023).

Disclosure of the CI who provided information for the search warrant is different than a “transactional witness” who would be a potential trial witness. United States v. Mompremier, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 86132 (E.D. Wis. May 17, 2023).*

The officers had probable cause for defendant’s stop without regard to what the CI said, so failure to corroborate the CI had no effect on the outcome. State v. Harrison, 2023-Ohio-1618 (3d Dist. May 15, 2023).*

Defendant’s stipulated plea agreement and PSR show there was reasonable suspicion for his stop. McAnally v. United States, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 84163 (W.D. Mo. Apr. 24, 2023).*

This entry was posted in Informant hearsay, Reasonable suspicion. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.