D.Nev.: GFE does not save GPS tracking of additional driver of vehicle

Rubin, a regular driver of defendant’s pickup had standing to challenge a tracking warrant put on it. The issuing judge, however, appears only to have authorized the tracking of Morgan’s use. The court declines to apply the good faith exception. United States v. Rubin, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 69865 (D. Nev. Apr. 21, 2023).

A stop 70 miles from the border on a regular smuggling route was with reasonable suspicion. United States v. Moreno, 2023 U.S. App. LEXIS 9422 (9th Cir. Apr. 20, 2023).*

Defendant signed the DUI consent form which explained the loss of driving privileges. It was not invalid consent based on fraud or unconstitutional conditions. Bauman v. State, 2023 Ind. App. LEXIS 118 (Apr. 19, 2023).*

The fact that some of the facts superficially appeared stale is irrelevant when the critical facts were close in time to the search. United States v. Marion, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 69442 (M.D. Fla. Apr. 20, 2023).*

This entry was posted in Consent, Good faith exception, Immigration checkpoints, Tracking warrant. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.