CA9: SOL on search claim starts with the search

Case over search dismissed on SOL grounds. Plaintiff on notice from the time of the search. Reyes v. Cty. of Wash., 2023 U.S. App. LEXIS 9353 (9th Cir. Apr. 19, 2023).

The officers obtaining and executing the warrant for defendant’s apartment, Unit D, didn’t know until getting inside and already finding child pornography that it was really two units in one. They didn’t know that before the child pornography was found. Affirmed. United States v. Parmer, 2023 U.S. App. LEXIS 9271 (9th Cir. Apr. 19, 2023).*

Plaintiff had no standing to sue over the search of car he borrowed that retrieved property he stole and was arrested for. Wilson v. Barnette, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 68364 (N.D. W.Va. Mar. 31, 2023),* adopted, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 67877 (N.D. W.Va. Apr. 18, 2023).*

Defendant was the passenger in a single car crash on the Maine Turnpike. When police arrived and talked to her and the driver, there was no seizure until reasonable suspicion developed. United States v. Howard, 2023 U.S. App. LEXIS 9320 (1st Cir. Apr. 19, 2023).*

This entry was posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Overseizure, Seizure, Standing. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.