E.D.Va.: Privacy Protection Act does not apply to suspects

The Privacy Protection Act of 1980 did not apply where there was probable cause to believe defendant was involved in a crime: the “suspect exception.” Sennett v. United States, 778 F. Supp. 2d 655 (E.D. Va. 2011):

At issue on the government’s motion to dismiss, or in the alternative for summary judgment, is whether the “suspect exception” to the Privacy Protection Act of 1980 (“PPA”), 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000aa(a)(1), (b)(1), bars plaintiff’s claim that federal law enforcement officers violated her PPA rights by searching her home and seizing photographs and photographic equipment. The PPA’s “suspect exception” applies only where government officials have probable cause to believe that the target of the search has committed an offense, and the materials seized are related to that offense. Here, the record evidence establishes that there was probable cause to believe that plaintiff was involved in the vandalism of the Four Seasons Hotel on April 12, 2008, and the subsequent search of plaintiff’s home related to the investigation of that incident. Accordingly, the PPA’s “suspect exception” applies, and summary judgment must be granted in favor of the government.

Officers approached defendant’s house to conduct a knock and talk. As they approached they could smell burning marijuana. At the door they heard something to the effect of “I’ve got a half pound of weed.” When the door opened, marijuana smoke billowed out. The entry was justified. United States v. Silkwood, 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 40040 (W.D. Mo. March 15, 2011).*

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.