N.D.Cal.: Attic apt and treehouse not specified in SW, but searches there still reasonable

An attic apartment and a treehouse were not specifically within the terms of the warrant, but the search was still reasonable. United States v. Ayala, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 227976 (N.D. Cal. Dec. 19, 2022).

Defendant didn’t timely challenge his detention leading to a Fourth Amendment search until his motion for new trial, and this was waiver. Smith v. State, 2022 Ga. LEXIS 321 (Dec. 20, 2022).*

Two people sitting in a car in a parking lot was not reasonable suspicion. State v. McBride, 2022 Wisc. App. LEXIS 1153 (Dec. 20, 2022) (unpublished).*

A Franks showing for a state arrest warrant where defendant was later indicted federally fails here because there’s no showing of a lack of probable cause based on a false statement. The federal indictment establishes probable cause here. United States v. Stokes, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 228653 (W.D. Va. Dec. 20, 2022).*

This entry was posted in Franks doctrine, Reasonable suspicion, Scope of search, Waiver. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.