CA5: Dog sniff of the person at the border does not require RS

A dog sniff of defendant’s person at the border did not require reasonable suspicion. United States v. Tenorio, 2022 U.S. App. LEXIS 33978 (5th Cir. Dec. 9, 2022).

The credibility determinations on whether defendant was subjected to arrest or not and whether he came to the police station voluntarily were resolved against him. People v. Townsend, 2022 IL App (1st) 200911, 2022 Ill. App. LEXIS 534 (Dec. 9, 2022).*

The court declines to specify the standard of review for appeal of a wiretap order. It’s reasonable under either. State v. Hebeishy, 2022 Utah App. LEXIS 140 (Dec. 8, 2022).*

This entry was posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Reasonable suspicion, Standards of review. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.